How Morehouse Helps the Test & Measurement Industry with Force Calibration

In the test and measurement world, everything depends on the quality of your reference standards. Whether you’re a commercial calibration lab, an OEM building load-cell–based systems, or an in-house test lab responsible for critical acceptance data, force measurements must be traceable, repeatable, and defensible. High-accuracy test and measurement calibration is essential for ensuring these results.

Modern force measurement systems must comply with international standards that ensure accuracy, traceability, and reliability. Morehouse supports full compliance with the most widely used test and measurement calibration standards in the industry.

Working to ASTM E4 and ISO 7500.

Test machines used for tension, compression, and materials testing—such as universal testing machines (UTMs), verification frames, and other force-measuring systems—often must meet:

ASTM E4 – Standard Practices for Force Verification of Testing Machines.

ISO 7500-1 – Verification of Static Uniaxial Testing Machines.

Both standards specify that force-measuring systems must be calibrated using higher-level force standards, not simply by comparing to internal sensors or unverified references. These requirements are central to reliable test and measurement calibration programs.

Requirement to Use ASTM E74 or ISO 376 for Calibration.

To meet ASTM E4 or ISO 7500, calibration laboratories must use force standards calibrated in accordance with:

ASTM E74 – Calibration of Force-Measuring Instruments for Verifying Testing Machines.

ISO 376 – Calibration of Force-Proving Instruments Used for Verification of Uniaxial Testing Machines.

These standards define the proper procedures for establishing calibration curves, classification accuracy, and measurement uncertainty for force-proving instruments (transfer standards).

Morehouse provides:

ASTM E74-compliant calibrations for load cells, force sensors, and transfer standards.

ISO 376 calibrations for proving instruments requiring international classification.

Deadweight-based primary calibrations suitable for ISO 376 Class 00 / Class 0 reference standards, or to provide an ASTM Class AA verified range of forces.

These services help ensure your test and measurement calibration program achieves the lowest possible uncertainty and the highest level of traceability.

When You're Looking for More Accurate Measurements

Morehouse would like the opportunity to earn your business. Contact us today.
Contact Sales

Ensuring Full Standards Compliance in Test and Measurement Calibration

Morehouse’s test and measurement calibration-first philosophy ensures:

  • Your load cells or transfer standards fully comply with ASTM E74 or ISO 376 requirements
  • Your testing machines can be certified to ASTM E4 or ISO 7500 with minimal uncertainty
  • All calibration data are traceable to SI via NIST, meeting accreditation and audit expectations

This provides measurement defensibility and eliminates risk during audits, proficiency testing, or inter-laboratory comparisons.

If you are working to ASTM E74, we have a load cell selection guide to simplify things.

Measurement Uncertainty Calculations Using ASTM E74 or ISO 376

Are you having trouble figuring out all of the requirements for calculating a CMC for force uncertainty or torque uncertainty? Morehouse has made an easier to use document in  Excel  to provide a template for calculating CMCs and explains everything required to pass an ISO/IEC 17025 audit. It took us hours to develop, and it is unlocked for anyone to have the tools needed to use this sheet or create their own.

The sheet is designed to work well with ASTM E74 and ISO 376 calibration standards (often the hardest ones to figure out how to properly conduct a Measurement Uncertainty for force with).

For additional uncertainty guidance, please read our Calculating Force Uncertainty for a Morehouse Force Calibrating Machine here.

We also offer additional classes on MU, free weekly emails, and force calibration basics classes, so please contact us if you are interested, or check out our force training page  offerings.

ASTM E74 Versus ISO 376

Morehouse has been performing ASTM E74 and ISO 376 calibrations for decades. We have followed the ASTM E74 standard since its likely introduction in 1947 and have performed ISO 376 calibrations since the early 2000s. Before the early 2000s, ISO 376 was a DIN standard that later became EN-10002-3 and then ISO 376 in the 1990s. Because of this long history, we had always assumed that the world's force measurement community was aware that the standards were completely different and could not be interchanged in any test and measurement calibration process.

However, we have learned that some laboratories provide field calibrations by intermixing and using an ASTM E74 calibration to certify a tensile machine to ISO 7500. Several organizations worldwide are unaware that the standards have vastly different criteria requirements, creating significant risks in force measurement and test and measurement calibration compliance.

If ISO 7500 is the requirement, then calibration must be performed in accordance with ISO 376 on the force-proving instruments used to certify the tensile machine. If ASTM E74 is the requirement, then the elastic force-measuring instrument must be calibrated following the ASTM E74 standard—ensuring proper alignment with accepted test and measurement calibration practices.

Test andMeasurement Calibration Summary

Morehouse delivers calibration-first accuracy for the test and measurement calibration industry, ensuring that every force measurement—whether produced by a load cell, indicator, transfer standard, or complete test system—is traceable, repeatable, and defensible. With system-level calibration, deadweight primary standards, custom-engineered sensors, and compliance with ASTM E4, ISO 7500, ASTM E74, and ISO 376, Morehouse helps labs and manufacturers achieve true measurement confidence.

By replicating real-use conditions, applying meaningful measurement uncertainty models, and offering custom solutions for complex setups, Morehouse ensures that correlation issues are reduced, audit performance is improved, and force data can be trusted across all applications.

If you want to know more about how Morehouse can help you make better test and measurement calibration, Contact Sales

For more information or webinars on measurement risk, test and measurement calibration, please visit our YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@mhforcecalibration

Eventually This is where we will have related Measurement Applications.

Frequently Asked Questions

Below are the most common questions we receive about test and measurement calibration measurement applications. This FAQ section is designed to give you quick, practical answers so you can better understand how our solutions fit your testing needs.

Related Products

Related Articles

Here are several articles that expand on the topics covered in this measurement application. These pieces were selected because they help explain the challenges, tools, and best practices connected to test and measurement calibration measurement applications, giving you a deeper look at the issues engineers and technicians encounter most often.

My ASTM E74 Change From Previous is Too High

ASTM E74 Change From Previous to Meet a Two-year Calibration Interval ASTM E74 Change From Previous to meet a two-year calibration interval is found in the ASTM E74 standard in section 11.2.1. The standard specifically states, “Force-measuring instruments shall demonstrate changes in the calibration values over the range of use during the recalibration interval of […]
Read More

Lower Limit Factor: Improve Calibration Accuracy for Load Cells and Other Force Measurement Equipment

Lower Limit Factor Improve Calibration Accuracy for Load Cells and Other Force Measurement Equipment LLF, or Lower Limit Factor, is a statistical estimate of the error in forces computed from the calibration equation of a force-measuring instrument when the instrument is calibrated following ASTM E74 standard practice for calibration and verification for force-measuring instruments. The […]
Read More

Load Cell Simulator Calibration Requirements to Calibrate my Digital Indicator: Is it Worth it? (ISO 376 and ASTM E74)

The Pros and Cons of Load Cell Simulator Calibration: Is Interchangeability Worth It? We have been asked more frequently about the benefits of calibrating everything as a system versus calibrating the load cells and indicators separately and intermixing them using a calibrated load cell simulator. Being able to intermix any load cell and meter combination […]
Read More
  • Type

Top cross linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram