Deadweight vs Hydraulic Force Calibration: Understanding the Difference

Deadweight vs. Hydraulic Force Calibration: Understanding the Difference 

Selecting between Deadweight vs Hydraulic Force Calibration is one of the most critical decisions in any force calibration laboratory. The choice directly impacts measurement uncertainty, productivity, and compliance with international standards such as ISO 376 and ASTM E74. 

This document explains how each method realizes force, the respective traceability paths, advantages, and limitations, helping you determine which approach best suits your laboratory’s accuracy requirements, workload, and facility constraints. 

When you calibrate force, you are essentially deciding how to realize force and how to transfer that realization to the device under test. In practice, most laboratories use either a deadweight machine or a transfer standard system that employs load cells. 

• Deadweight machines that realize force directly from SI-traceable mass (force = m·g, corrected for local gravity, air buoyancy, and material density).

• Hydraulic machines that generate or multiply force using fluid pressure—either as hydraulic amplification standards (piston-area ratios, less common) or the more common hydraulic comparators (e.g., Morehouse Automated Universal Calibrating Machines, UCMs) that apply force with a hydraulic actuator while comparing the device to a calibrated reference transducer (load cell).

Choosing the right calibration method affects uncertainty, productivity, and compliance with ISO 376/ASTM E74/Conformity Assessment Ability.

Deadweight vs Hydraulic Force Calibration: How does each method generate force

Deadweight (primary standard)

Deadweight machines apply known masses directly to a loading frame. To be a primary standard, the masses are determined by comparison to SI-traceable references and adjusted for local gravity, air buoyancy, and material density; the realized force is direct and does not pass through levers or hydraulic multipliers. In well-designed deadweight machines, typical expanded uncertainties are on the order of 0.001–0.005 % of applied force, enabling the tightest classifications (e.g., ISO 376 Class 00, ASTM E74 Class AA).

Why this matters: ISO 376’s best classification (Class 00) expects very low reference uncertainty—deadweight is the preferred path because it “usually” achieves better than 0.0025 % of applied force throughout the range.

ASTM E74 requires deadweight machines to be used to generate a Class AA verified range of forces for a reference transducer. That transducer is then used in a machine such as the Morehouse Automated UCM as the reference standard.

Hydraulic

Hydraulic approaches come in two flavors:

1. Hydraulic amplification standards. A known deadweight load is applied to a small piston; fluid pressure transfers to a larger piston. The force scales with the ratio of effective piston areas (Pascal’s law). This extends force ranges to multi-meganewton levels (national labs routinely use direct deadweight to a few MN and hydraulic multiplication above that—e.g., PTB up to ~16.5 MN). Typical expanded uncertainties are roughly 0.01–0.05 %; fine, low-end control can be harder, and operation is often slower than comparator machines.
2. Hydraulic comparator machines (UCM). These use a hydraulic actuator to apply force and compare the device under test to a reference transducer previously calibrated (ideally by deadweight using ISO 376 or ASTM E74). Properly designed systems routinely achieve ~0.02–0.05 % expanded uncertainty (even better with high-end references & automation), with excellent throughput for daily work.

Note: Morehouse also utilizes machines such as the BCM and PCM, which operate at lower forces driven by a screw jack.

Deadweight vs Hydraulic Force Calibration Traceability & standards (ISO 376 / ASTM E74)

• Deadweight is a direct SI realization through mass, with the shortest, simplest traceability chain. That’s why it’s the default recommendation for ISO 376 Class 00 reference transducers and for generating ASTM E74 Class AA verified ranges of forces.
• Hydraulic amplification is still ultimately traceable (to mass and piston areas), but the chain includes geometric area measurements, alignment of pistons, temperature/viscosity effects, and seal friction. It can support ISO 376 Class 00 at suitable ranges, but will usually carry larger uncertainty at the low end and operate more slowly. Most of the time, multiple transducers are used to perform cross-checks and SPC.
• Hydraulic comparators (UCMs) depend on the reference standard’s calibration (ideally deadweight to ISO 376 or ASTM E74). Achievable uncertainty in the comparator is therefore dominated by the reference’s uncertainty plus the machine’s repeatability, environment, alignment, and operator effects; with good design and control, ≤0.02 % is realistic. Automating the machine often improves throughput and lower measurement uncertainty by improving repeatability.

In general, Deadweight machines are the most accurate path to ISO 376 Class 00/ASTM E74 Class AA, while UCMs are described as hydraulic force calibration systems are often optimized for versatility and productivity.

Alignment, adapters, and the machine itself

Regardless of method, you must keep the loading line pure—plumb, level, square, rigid, and free from torsion—and use proper adapters (e.g., tension adapters for tension work, compression platens of the right hardness/flatness). Poor fixturing and off-axis loading can dominate the error budget (it’s common to see errors above 0.05 % simply from the wrong top block hardness in compression).

Hydraulic comparators vary in design; the better ones mount reference transducers to replicate how they were calibrated (e.g., in compression with alignment balls/sphericals) and integrate controls that avoid overshooting and hold points long enough to satisfy ISO 376 timing.

What this means for uncertainty (and your audit)

Every calibration ends in an uncertainty budget. In comparator systems, mainly, major contributors include reference standard uncertainty, repeatability, environmental stability, operator variability, adapter alignment, and machine design. With disciplined control of these terms, a modern UCM can credibly document ≤0.02 % expanded uncertainty; deadweight can go lower when you need it.

Tip: If you’re targeting ISO 376 Class 00, plan on deadweight for the reference calibration and ensure your machine stores raw data and meets ISO timing (no readings within 30 s of force changes; uniform loading intervals).

Deadweight vs Hydraulic Force Calibration: Selecting the right path: quick decision guide

1. What uncertainty do you actually need?
   • ≤0.005 % required for ASTM E74 Class AA or ISO 376 Class 00 across a broad range → Deadweight.
   • ~0.02–0.05 % adequate with high throughput and automation → Hydraulic comparator (UCM) with deadweight‑calibrated references.
2. What’s your workload?
   • Many devices per day, frequent setup changes → UCM/PCM (automation boosts productivity and consistency).
   • Fewer, highest‑stakes references → Deadweight sessions with meticulous adapter control.
3. What can your facility support?
   • Floor loading/ceiling height/gravity survey okay? Deadweight gives the best TURs.
   • Limited space/budget? A UCM provides excellent uncertainty for most industrial needs.

For product‑level context from Morehouse: deadweight systems are positioned for ISO 376 Class 00/ASTM E74 Class AA work, while UCMs are hydraulic comparators built for long life and high throughput. Morehouse Instrument Company, Inc.

Deadweight vs Hydraulic Force Calibration Common myths & gotchas (and how to avoid them)

• “Hydraulic machines can’t meet Class 00.”
  Not quite. Hydraulic amplification systems at national labs can support Class 00 classification, especially at higher ranges; however, they typically carry a higher CMC than direct deadweight and may be slower to operate. Verify the uncertainty at your points of interest.
• “Comparator = deadweight accuracy.”
  A UCM inherits the reference’s uncertainty and adds its own contributors (repeatability, environment, alignment, control). With good practice it’s excellent, but deadweight still sets the floor. Build—and show—your uncertainty budget.
• “Adapters don’t matter.”
  They do. Use ISO‑recommended tension/compression fittings; control hardness, flatness, and geometry. Misfixturing can add ≥0.05 % error—more than the difference between methods. Replicate field use during calibration.
• “Just span the meter; you’ll be fine.”
  When your reference is calibrated to ISO 376/ASTM E74, use the calibration coefficients (polynomial fits) rather than multi-point “span only”—it lowers interpolation error and protects your uncertainty.

Deadweight vs Hydraulic: Field‑tested best practices (apply to both)

• Keep the machine plumb, level, square, rigid, and low‑torsion; design and adapters that maintain a pure line of force reduce bending and side loads.
• Warm up electronics; exercise to max force; respect ISO timing and, if needed, run creep/reversibility checks per ISO 376 Case C/D.
• Control the environment (temperature stability, humidity) and log it—auditors will ask, and your uncertainty depends on it.
• Train for reproducibility. R&R studies (technician‑to‑technician) often reveal hidden variability you can eliminate, or automate the UCM for better R & R.

Deadweight vs Hydraulic Force Calibration Bottom line

• Choose deadweight when you need the lowest possible uncertainty and the simplest SI traceability—especially for ISO 376 Class 00 and ASTM E74 Class AA references.
• Choose hydraulic amplification to reach very high forces while maintaining strong traceability—expect excellent but not deadweight‑level CMC, and slower operation.
• Choose a hydraulic comparator (UCM) for day‑to‑day productivity and ~0.02–0.05  % uncertainty—particularly effective when references are calibrated by deadweight and you control adapters, alignment, and environment.

Deadweight vs Hydraulic Force Calibration References used in this article

• ISO 376 guidance on reference classification, machine design (alignment/fixtures), and the role of deadweight for Class 00; plus coefficient use and common error sources.
• Setting up a Force Calibration Laboratory—typical uncertainties by machine type, hydraulic amplification at NMIs, and facility considerations.
• Force Calibration for Technicians & Quality Managers—why calibration ≠ verification, traceability, and practical impacts of adapters and loading conditions.
• Uncertainty budget for a UCM—contributors, methods, and realistic targets (≤0.02 %).

For more information on deadweight  deadweight machines

For more information on Morehouse  UCM Machines.

About Morehouse  

We believe in changing how people think about Force and Torque calibration in everything we do, including discussions on Deadweight vs hydraulic force calibration machines.

This includes setting expectations and challenging the "just calibrate it" mentality by educating our customers on what matters and what may cause significant errors.

We focus on reducing these errors and making our products simple and user-friendly.

This means your instruments will pass calibration more often and produce more precise measurements, giving you the confidence to focus on your business.

Companies around the globe rely on Morehouse for accuracy and speed.

Our measurement uncertainties are 10-50 times lower than the competition, providing you with more accuracy and precision in force measurement.

We turn around your equipment in 7-10 business days so you can return to work quickly and save money.

When you choose Morehouse, you're not just paying for a calibration service or a load cell.

You're investing in peace of mind, knowing your equipment is calibrated accurately and on time.

Through Great People, Great Leaders, and Great Equipment, we empower organizations to make Better Measurements that enhance quality, reduce risk, and drive innovation.

With over a century of experience, we're committed to raising industry standards, fostering collaboration, helping with understanding risk, and delivering exceptional calibration solutions that build a safer, more accurate future.

Contact Morehouse at info@mhforce.com to learn more about our calibration services and load cell products.

Email us if you ever want to chat or have questions about a blog.

We love talking about this stuff. We have many more topics other than expressing SI units!

Our YouTube channel has videos on various force and torque calibration topics here.

#Deadweight vs Hydraulic Force Calibration